<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JUnit 4 error: reference to assertEquals is ambiguous</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.btaz.com/java/junit-4-error-reference-to-assertequals-is-ambiguous/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.btaz.com/java/junit-4-error-reference-to-assertequals-is-ambiguous/</link>
	<description>Promoting the art of coding</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:52:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Duran</title>
		<link>http://www.btaz.com/java/junit-4-error-reference-to-assertequals-is-ambiguous/comment-page-1/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Duran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.btaz.com/?p=67#comment-209</guid>
		<description>Finally I have found what I think is the problem. With Eclipse, the delivered JUnit 4.5.0 jar doesn&#039;t behave as the 4.3 version. If I ecplicitly points to the version I have downloaded from JUint.org (a new 4.7 version, not polluted by Eclipse) it works again :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally I have found what I think is the problem. With Eclipse, the delivered JUnit 4.5.0 jar doesn&#8217;t behave as the 4.3 version. If I ecplicitly points to the version I have downloaded from JUint.org (a new 4.7 version, not polluted by Eclipse) it works again <img src='http://www.btaz.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duran</title>
		<link>http://www.btaz.com/java/junit-4-error-reference-to-assertequals-is-ambiguous/comment-page-1/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Duran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 11:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.btaz.com/?p=67#comment-208</guid>
		<description>I have a similar problem but I haven&#039;t come up with a solution yet. This code doesn&#039;t behave as expected with JUnit4_4.5.0:

assertEquals(&quot;Always fail: &quot;, 0L, 0L);
assertEquals(&quot;Always OK: &quot;, Long.valueOf(0L), Long.valueOf(0L));

I haven&#039;t figured out why, and haven&#039;t come up with an acceptable solution either since similar code exists in numerous test cases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a similar problem but I haven&#8217;t come up with a solution yet. This code doesn&#8217;t behave as expected with JUnit4_4.5.0:</p>
<p>assertEquals(&#8220;Always fail: &#8220;, 0L, 0L);<br />
assertEquals(&#8220;Always OK: &#8220;, Long.valueOf(0L), Long.valueOf(0L));</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t figured out why, and haven&#8217;t come up with an acceptable solution either since similar code exists in numerous test cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virginia</title>
		<link>http://www.btaz.com/java/junit-4-error-reference-to-assertequals-is-ambiguous/comment-page-1/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Virginia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.btaz.com/?p=67#comment-207</guid>
		<description>Thank you, thank you.  I encountered this problem when I upgraded my JUnit4_4.3.1 to JUnit4_4.5.0.  Using the older version, I was comparing &quot;double&quot; to &quot;Double&quot; and the assertEquals(Object, Object) method worked fine.  After the upgrade, I received the error you describe above.  Your post was very helpful.

~ Va</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, thank you.  I encountered this problem when I upgraded my JUnit4_4.3.1 to JUnit4_4.5.0.  Using the older version, I was comparing &#8220;double&#8221; to &#8220;Double&#8221; and the assertEquals(Object, Object) method worked fine.  After the upgrade, I received the error you describe above.  Your post was very helpful.</p>
<p>~ Va</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
